Re: [vfs] support JCIFS

2014-05-27 Thread Dan Tran
will be necessary to use something other than 'optional' >> to achieve that - for example 'provided'. >> >> -D >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory >> >wrote: >>> >>> Moved. >>>&

Re: [vfs] support JCIFS

2014-05-27 Thread Schalk Cronjé
al message From: sebb < seb...@gmail.com> Date:05/23/2014 10:27 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [vfs] support JCIFS On 23 May 2014 15:24, Gary Gregory wrote: Also wondering... why can't we deliver our code even if the jar we depend in the POM on has an incompatible li

Re: [vfs] support JCIFS

2014-05-24 Thread sebb
inal message From: sebb < >> seb...@gmail.com> Date:05/23/2014 10:27 (GMT-05:00) >> To: Commons Users List >> Subject: Re: [vfs] support JCIFS >> On 23 May 2014 15:24, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Also wondering... why can't we deliver our code even

Fwd: Re: [vfs] support JCIFS

2014-05-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Moving this thread to the dev list. Thoughts?  Gary Original message From: sebb Date:05/23/2014 10:27 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [vfs] support JCIFS On 23 May 2014 15:24, Gary Gregory wrote: > Also wondering... why can't we deliver our code