Re: [proxy2] Create new utils module...

2012-06-12 Thread James Carman
Yes of course. It's just difficult to test things like invokers and what not without a ProxyFactory implementation. These should be moved to a utils module. This would also keep the API clean and free from dependencies. On Jun 12, 2012 2:01 PM, "Matt Benson" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:

Re: [proxy2] Create new utils module...

2012-06-12 Thread Matt Benson
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:42 PM, James Carman wrote: > All, > > When trying to test some of the utility classes (such as > DuckTypinginvoker), it would be useful to have a ProxyFactory to play > with.  However, in "core", we don't have access to one since they've > been broken out into their own

[proxy2] Create new utils module...

2012-06-11 Thread James Carman
All, When trying to test some of the utility classes (such as DuckTypinginvoker), it would be useful to have a ProxyFactory to play with. However, in "core", we don't have access to one since they've been broken out into their own modules (which reference core). What if we left "core" for just t