miss something, but for me that sounds safe.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Matt Benson
>>To: Commons Developers List ; Mark Struberg
>>
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 4:22 PM
>>Subject: R
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 4:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>Oki, let me explain what I meant.
>>Currently the methods must be private to be really secure. Bu
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> >
> > From: Matt Benson
> >To: Commons Developers List ; Mark Struberg <
> strub...@yahoo.de>
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:31 PM
> >Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
>
Mark Struberg
>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:31 PM
>Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>Heh, the other option has been 'privilator'
>>
>>Catchy a
ou can't do with
> e.g. AspectJ, but as mentioned in the overview the [privilizer] code adds
> no runtime dependencies (not even its own API jar!).
>
> Matt
>
>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: Matt Benson
can't do with
e.g. AspectJ, but as mentioned in the overview the [privilizer] code adds
no runtime dependencies (not even its own API jar!).
Matt
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Matt Benson
> > To: Commons Developers List
>
ethods which are
> perfectly save.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Matt Benson
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox com
:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
>
>G lad to hear it, Phil! I was originally calling it "privileged method
> weaver" but that's a little long for a Commons component. Mark
> Struberg
> cam
Glad to hear it, Phil! I was originally calling it "privileged method
weaver" but that's a little long for a Commons component. Mark Struberg
came up with "privilizer" for me--short, but still fairly suggestive of the
component's purpose.
Matt
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrot
Hi Gary,
Hmm... the site is there as far as I can tell. The "docs" such as they
are are the overview page of the site. I also need to go back and include
the individual module sites so you can easily reference the Maven plugin's
generated docs. There is an example module which demonstrates the
On 11/19/12 2:42 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have recently been working on some code to simplify the task of working
> with the Java security APIs and an ASF colleague convinced me that the
> package had a chance of being a viable Commons component. I have added it
> to the sandbox and
Hi Matt,
I do not see a site under https://commons.apache.org/sandbox/
Before I think about looking, are there any docs, examples, and so on?
Gary
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have recently been working on some code to simplify the task of working
> with
Hi all,
I have recently been working on some code to simplify the task of working
with the Java security APIs and an ASF colleague convinced me that the
package had a chance of being a viable Commons component. I have added it
to the sandbox and it is available on the website by now as well.
Typ
13 matches
Mail list logo
