On 12/12/11 5:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 00:02, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> thanks for t
On 13 December 2011 00:02, sebb wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies o
On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Phil,
thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
am currently in the situ
On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
>>> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
>>> can
On 12/12/2011 20:14, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 1:08 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
>> if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
>
> Please do dive in and have a look. This is all new code for 2.
On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
>> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
>> can work with snapshots, but having a releas
On 12/12/11 1:08 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
> if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
Please do dive in and have a look. This is all new code for 2.0 and
we could really use more eyeballs and testi
Hi Phil,
I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
I'll certainly give a help to work toward the release!
All the best, have a nice day!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejou
On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
> can work with snapshots, but having a release would be definitively
> better :)
>
> So I start fi
Hi Phil,
thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
can work with snapshots, but having a release would be definitively
better :)
So I start filling an issue and update synchronized pools in
PoolUtils
On 12/12/11 10:56 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
>> pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
>> remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started
On 12/12/11 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
> pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
> remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started playing with
> PoolUtils with the SynchronizedO
Hi all guys,
time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started playing with
PoolUtils with the SynchronizedObjectPool[1] inner class...
Can we discuss about intro
13 matches
Mail list logo
