On 6/8/11 6:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 08:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/5/11 7:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> The AbandonedObjectPool test case that I just commented out in
>>> [dbcp] trunk is failing because GOP getNumActive returns -1. My
>>> first thought was that this is a timin
On 06/06/2011 08:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/5/11 7:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The AbandonedObjectPool test case that I just commented out in
>> [dbcp] trunk is failing because GOP getNumActive returns -1. My
>> first thought was that this is a timing issue due to lack of
>> synchronization in
On 6/5/11 7:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The AbandonedObjectPool test case that I just commented out in
> [dbcp] trunk is failing because GOP getNumActive returns -1. My
> first thought was that this is a timing issue due to lack of
> synchronization in invalidate and general non-protection of
> _a
The AbandonedObjectPool test case that I just commented out in
[dbcp] trunk is failing because GOP getNumActive returns -1. My
first thought was that this is a timing issue due to lack of
synchronization in invalidate and general non-protection of
_allObjects and _idleObjects; but I can't demonstr
