Re: [pool] Release process

2009-05-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Perf testing has gone well so far.  I have one more batch of javadoc / > ridiculously-long-line elimination changes to commit and then I will cut an > RC.   There are a couple of things that I want to get community input on > before plowing for

Re: [pool] Release process

2009-05-24 Thread Mark Thomas
> From: Phil Steitz > > Perf testing has gone well so far. Great news. > 0) @author tags. Leave/delete - happy either way with a slight preference for delete. > 1) Release process. Sounds good to me. Mark - To unsubscrib

Re: [pool] Release process

2009-05-24 Thread Mark Thomas
> From: Phil Steitz > > Perf testing has gone well so far. Great news. > 0) @author tags. Leave/delete - happy either way with a slight preference for delete. > 1) Release process. Sounds good to me. Mark - To unsubscrib

Re: [pool] Release process

2009-05-23 Thread James Carman
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > 1) Release process.  I am NOT planning on using the maven release plugin.  I > will get working assemblies to create tarballs, make tags, named RC1, 2 (NOT > "mutable" release tags) and push the tarballs and jar artifacts manually to > the mirr

[pool] Release process

2009-05-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Perf testing has gone well so far. I have one more batch of javadoc / ridiculously-long-line elimination changes to commit and then I will cut an RC. There are a couple of things that I want to get community input on before plowing forward with the RC. 0) @author tags. This has been discus