On 2 November 2017 at 05:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The implementations should be almost identical since they derive from
> the same source. The key difference is that the Pool version exposes
> some internals that the JDK version does not. Unless the JDK provided
> implementation has changed (and
On 01/11/17 19:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Pool implements its own LinkedBlockingDeque which is almost like Java
> 7's LinkedBlockingDeque.
>
> The JRE LinkedBlockingDeque is not a drop in replacement for
> our LinkedBlockingDeque.
>
> Any thoughts on migrating from our custom LinkedBl
I think it sounds like a good idea. Probably worth creating a JIRA ticket for
that and checking if anyone would volunteer to tackle it.
CheersBruno
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2017 8:39 AM
Subject: [pool] LinkedBlockingDeque
Hi All
Hi All,
Pool implements its own LinkedBlockingDeque which is almost like Java
7's LinkedBlockingDeque.
The JRE LinkedBlockingDeque is not a drop in replacement for
our LinkedBlockingDeque.
Any thoughts on migrating from our custom LinkedBlockingDeque to the JRE's
version?
Gary
