On 6/25/12 11:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> +1 - drop it.
>
> I'd rather put the effort into the Javadoc.
My thoughts exactly. I will keep plugging away as I review the code.
Phil
> That is where my focus was when working on the updates for pool 2.0.
>
> I'd add that one of the things that drove m
+1 - drop it.
I'd rather put the effort into the Javadoc. That is where my focus was when
working on the updates for pool 2.0.
I'd add that one of the things that drove me mad with pool 2 was that the same
information was repeated in multiple places and trying to keep them in sync is
really ha
There is not much in this doc beyond class diagrams that are now out
of date. Unless someone wants to volunteer to update the diagrams
and maybe add some more meaningful content, I propose that we drop
this for 2.0. We can always add it back later if someone gets
inspired. Personally, I would se
