On Dec 8, 2007 6:44 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2007 2:30 AM, Jörg Schaible
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 20/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2007 2:30 AM, Jörg Schaible
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >>> Any other comments on
On 11/20/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Since the JUL loggers sit in the system class path, any formatter
> > implementation *must* be available also in the system class path.
>
> Isn't this part of what JULI fixes?
>
>From the tomcat docs, looks like yes
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Since the JUL loggers sit in the system class path, any formatter
> implementation *must* be available also in the system class path.
Isn't this part of what JULI fixes?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe
On Nov 20, 2007 2:30 AM, Jörg Schaible
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Phil Steitz wrote:
> [snip]
> >>> Any other comments on the naming, levels, use of JUL before I start?
> >>
> >> Why not using
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
[snip]
>>> Any other comments on the naming, levels, use of JUL before I start?
>>
>> Why not using commons-logging? It supports trace level. JUL
> is really a pain. It is applicable
On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>
> >>> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
>
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version
of pool 1.3
On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> > > discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> > > pool 1.3 that I have been usi
sebb wrote:
> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> > discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> > pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test
> > performance. I used jdk
On 19/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test
> performance. I used jdk logging
I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test
performance. I used jdk logging with the following guidelines
* Finest (trace) level for det
12 matches
Mail list logo