Hi Jochen!!!
green light from my side, that would be a *great* improvement IMHO!!!
Targeting to a different package would at the same time help you
detecting the differences with current code, so filling missing parts
should be less painful.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help and feel free to pi
On Jun 11, 2011, at 11:49, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
> detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
> possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
> and then would switch to a d
Hi,
I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
and then would switch to a dynamically generated parser.
Unfortunately, it is almost impos
