I'd split it into multiple modules.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think the examples should be pre-compiled at all. They are
>> source code examples that dem
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the examples should be pre-compiled at all. They are
> source code examples that demonstrate how to use the API. Unless
> something has changed recently, they are not intended as fully
> functional prog
On 23/09/2008, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sebb
> writes:
>
> >On 22/09/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I'd rather put the examples into a separate Jar of their own,
> >> but again I'm not sure what other Commons p
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:05 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review
> >
> > Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains
> > only the class files.
&g
; To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review
>
> Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains
> only the class files.
>
> Surely it should contain the source files instead?
PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:53 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
> >
> > http://people.
er
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:53 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review
>
> Hi all
>
> The
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0
James Carman wrote:
What tag was this built from in SVN?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The RC for n
I didn't like the examples stuff being in the "examples" package, but
I don't guess that's really a violation or anything. I'd rather see
it in o.a.c.net.examples.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it cont
Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains
only the class files.
Surely it should contain the source files instead?
On 18/09/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The jar files in commons-net-2.0.0-bin.tar are rather inconsistent as
> regards LICENSE and NOTICE files
The jar files in commons-net-2.0.0-bin.tar are rather inconsistent as
regards LICENSE and NOTICE files
commons-net-2.0.0.jar has both in META-INF directory
commons-net-2.0.0-tests.jar does not have either
commons-net-ftp-2.0.0.jar has both in top-level directory (and it has
a META-INF dir)
The na
What tag was this built from in SVN?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0
>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0
>
> Changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html#a2.0
>
> Can someone
Hi all
The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html#a2.0
Can someone take a look at the RC and see if there are any issues? If
not, I'll set up a
14 matches
Mail list logo
