On 1/11/15 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 1/11/15 9:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct
>>> computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss
>>> of significance error
On 1/11/15 9:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct
>> computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss
>> of significance errors when computing them from cumulative
>> proba
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct
computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss
of significance errors when computing them from cumulative
probabilities, which is the only thing they can do
There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct
computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss
of significance errors when computing them from cumulative
probabilities, which is the only thing they can do with current
implementations. In some cases, we can fair
