- "Phil Steitz" a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > Le 24/07/2010 04:41, Bill Barker a écrit :
> >>
> >> --
> >> From: "Phil Steitz"
> >> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:42 PM
> >> To: "Commons Developers List"
> >> Subject: Re: clirr for MATH
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 24/07/2010 04:41, Bill Barker a écrit :
>>
>> --
>> From: "Phil Steitz"
>> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:42 PM
>> To: "Commons Developers List"
>> Subject: Re: clirr for MATH-389
>>
>>> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Inten
> >> We all agree that the [math] API needs work. If we cut more frequent
> >> major releases, we can evolve the API. Lets do that.
> >>
> >
> > +1 on creating a 2.2 branch and concentrating [math] on 3.0.
>
> I would really much like to have a new version out this year, I need
> some changes fo
Le 24/07/2010 04:41, Bill Barker a écrit :
>
>
> --
> From: "Phil Steitz"
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:42 PM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: Re: clirr for MATH-389
>
>> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> Intentional but still a mistake
