On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:04:51PM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 12/09/2012 16:32, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> >
> > I think that "silly classes" should not be allowed in CM!
>
> As all I am able to do is silly work, [...]
^^
Didn't you mean "silly walk"? 8-
Le 12/09/2012 16:32, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> I think that "silly classes" should not be allowed in CM!
As all I am able to do is silly work, I should stop working for [math]
then ;-)
> ;-)
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Continuing the work on the new differentiation framework, I am facing a
>> silly
I think that "silly classes" should not be allowed in CM!
;-)
> Hi all,
>
> Continuing the work on the new differentiation framework, I am facing a
> silly naming problem. This problem is exactly the same I encountered
> while I updated the solvers: the Java language does not allow to inherit
>
Hi all,
Continuing the work on the new differentiation framework, I am facing a
silly naming problem. This problem is exactly the same I encountered
while I updated the solvers: the Java language does not allow to inherit
from the same parameterized interface with two different parameters.
So whe
