Re: [math] restructuring linear package

-1 on splitting out the others. They really do hang together and are pretty easy to understand. In general I would recommend a -1 on everything that smacks of fancy structure before it is needed. Commons math has a history of gratuitously harder to use interfaces than necessary. For instance, a

Re: [math] restructuring linear package

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> The linear package has been changed a lot lately and numerous new >> interfaces and classes have been added. This is now a huge package with >> more than 30 files in it. >> >> What about splitting it into subpackages ? I would propose to add >> "matri

Re: [math] restructuring linear package

Luc Maisonobe wrote: The linear package has been changed a lot lately and numerous new interfaces and classes have been added. This is now a huge package with more than 30 files in it. What about splitting it into subpackages ? I would propose to add "matrix", "vector", "decomposition" and "erro

[math] restructuring linear package

The linear package has been changed a lot lately and numerous new interfaces and classes have been added. This is now a huge package with more than 30 files in it. What about splitting it into subpackages ? I would propose to add "matrix", "vector", "decomposition" and "error"/"exception". Luc -