Le 16/02/2014 18:28, Gilles a écrit :
> Hi Luc.
>
> [...]
> I had a look at Evan's poposal in MATH-1026. I really like it!
>
> Do you think we could replace our current lestsquares (which has never
> been released yet), with this new one and finish it?
In principle ye
Hi Luc.
[...]
I had a look at Evan's poposal in MATH-1026. I really like it!
Do you think we could replace our current lestsquares (which has
never
been released yet), with this new one and finish it?
In principle yes (see my first comment on the JIRA page). In
practice,
I'm
not sure.
C
Le 14/02/2014 16:33, Evan Ward a écrit :
>
> On 02/13/2014 12:19 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hello Luc.
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:10:36 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> Le 08/02/2014 22:16, Gilles a écrit :
>>>
> Other issues to be discussed:
>
> * [MATH-1008]
>
On 02/13/2014 12:19 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hello Luc.
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:10:36 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> Le 08/02/2014 22:16, Gilles a écrit :
>>
Other issues to be discussed:
* [MATH-1008]
a new package has been created o.a.c.m.fitting.least
Hello Luc.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:10:36 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Le 08/02/2014 22:16, Gilles a écrit :
Other issues to be discussed:
* [MATH-1008]
a new package has been created o.a.c.m.fitting.leastsquares
which
contains some interface for the new fluent API but they
Hi Gilles,
Le 08/02/2014 22:16, Gilles a écrit :
>> Other issues to be discussed:
>>
>> * [MATH-1008]
>>
>>a new package has been created o.a.c.m.fitting.leastsquares which
>>contains some interface for the new fluent API but they are also
>>used elsewhere so I guess it would be more
