On Nov 25, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Sébastien Brisard
wrote:
>>
>> One more point on this. "Consistency" as some sort of independent goal by
>> itself has no place in open source software. We need to keep our eyes on
>> the prize, which is making it easy for users to understand and use the
>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:16:31PM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> >
> > One more point on this. "Consistency" as some sort of independent goal by
> > itself has no place in open source software. We need to keep our eyes on
> > the prize, which is making it easy for users to understand and us
e too.
Have a nice weekend,
Bruno P. Kinoshita
De: Sébastien Brisard
Para: Commons Developers List
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 25 de Novembro de 2011 9:16
Assunto: Re: [math] javadoc implicit formatting rules
>
> One more point on this. "Consisten
>
> One more point on this. "Consistency" as some sort of independent goal by
> itself has no place in open source software. We need to keep our eyes on the
> prize, which is making it easy for users to understand and use the software
> and for volunteers to get involved. To the extent that c
One more point on this. "Consistency" as some sort of independent goal by
itself has no place in open source software. We need to keep our eyes on the
prize, which is making it easy for users to understand and use the software and
for volunteers to get involved. To the extent that consistent
OK, now I feel ashamed for raising such a trivial issue ;).
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 25/11/2011 08:13, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> here are a few questions about the implicit rules in use in CM for
>> formatting Javadoc comments, that I've wanted to post for a long time.
>> Since I'm now reviewing other people's
>
> It seems really a detail to me (your mileage may vary), the content of
> the javadoc being far more important than its form.
>
> Luc
>
That's the kind of answer I wanted to read, but I just wanted to
check. So when committing someone else's work, I won't worry about
that point.
Thanks,
Sébastie
Le 25/11/2011 08:13, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi,
> here are a few questions about the implicit rules in use in CM for
> formatting Javadoc comments, that I've wanted to post for a long time.
> Since I'm now reviewing other people's patches, I think it's high time
> to clear these questions up
Hi,
here are a few questions about the implicit rules in use in CM for
formatting Javadoc comments, that I've wanted to post for a long time.
Since I'm now reviewing other people's patches, I think it's high time
to clear these questions up. If I'm not mistaken,
(1) every @param tag should start wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
