On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:04:21 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
[...]
What do you think?
I've never used this package, nor did I read much of its code;
but I trust his main developer to know how to bring improvements
into it.
Even if this is not likely the end of history, for this package as
well as
On 9/17/13 2:07 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 04:22 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
>> Hi Luc,
>>
>> On Mon 16 Sep 2013 12:04:21 PM EDT, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
>>> It seems to be well suited for the needs, an
On 09/17/2013 04:22 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
> Hi Luc,
>
> On Mon 16 Sep 2013 12:04:21 PM EDT, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
>> It seems to be well suited for the needs, and would allow a better
>> separation of the inte
Hi Luc,
On Mon 16 Sep 2013 12:04:21 PM EDT, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
> It seems to be well suited for the needs, and would allow a better
> separation of the integrator "engine" and the integrator "state". The
> eng
Hello,
I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
It seems to be well suited for the needs, and would allow a better
separation of the integrator "engine" and the integrator "state". The
engine will hold all the coefficients for the linear combinations within
the integ
