> These classes are not used anywhere else in [math] and I am not sure
> it is the best separation of concerns between [math] and client apps
> to provide this stuff. If we want to keep them, the generic
> parameterization should be fixed. I propose that we drop them from
> 3.0. Any objections t
> >These classes are not used anywhere else in [math] and I am not sure
> >it is the best separation of concerns between [math] and client apps
> >to provide this stuff. If we want to keep them, the generic
> >parameterization should be fixed. I propose that we drop them from
> >3.0. Any objecti
Le 02/10/2011 18:14, Phil Steitz a écrit :
These classes are not used anywhere else in [math] and I am not sure
it is the best separation of concerns between [math] and client apps
to provide this stuff. If we want to keep them, the generic
parameterization should be fixed. I propose that we dr
These classes are not used anywhere else in [math] and I am not sure
it is the best separation of concerns between [math] and client apps
to provide this stuff. If we want to keep them, the generic
parameterization should be fixed. I propose that we drop them from
3.0. Any objections to this?
P
