subject:"\[math\] comments on MATH\-391"

Re: [math] comments on MATH-391

2010-10-03 Thread Phil Steitz

On 10/3/10 2:21 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I have fixed MATH-391. Now vectors can be built with 0 length using several constructors. There is however one remaining problem, for Field-based vectors (i.e. ArrayFieldVector). For these vectors, we need to store the field in addition to the ve

[math] comments on MATH-391

2010-10-03 Thread Luc Maisonobe

Hi all, I have fixed MATH-391. Now vectors can be built with 0 length using several constructors. There is however one remaining problem, for Field-based vectors (i.e. ArrayFieldVector). For these vectors, we need to store the field in addition to the vector components. For example a Fraction Vec