Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:05:12PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I > >>> s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I > >>> notice others are changing the @throws

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-05 Thread sebb
On 5 October 2011 02:05, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare the >>>

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I >>> s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I >>> notice others are changing the @throws to declare the >>> MathXxException. We should probably be consisten

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I > > s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I > > notice others are changing the @throws to declare the > > MathXxException. We should probably be consistent. I don't know if > > it really makes any

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 12:57:33PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I > s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I > notice others are changing the @throws to declare the > MathXxException. We should probably be

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread sebb
On 4 October 2011 20:57, Phil Steitz wrote: > I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I > s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I > notice others are changing the @throws to declare the > MathXxException.  We should probably be consistent.  I

[math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Phil Steitz
I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare the MathXxException. We should probably be consistent. I don't know if it really makes any difference. I see