On 05/23/2013 09:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 08:53 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 23/05/2013 17:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
plotting functions (was ok for si
On 05/23/2013 08:53 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 17:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>>> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
>>> jfreechart
Le 23/05/2013 17:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
>> jfreechart.
>> Is it ok to include this dependency with scope
On 05/23/2013 05:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
>> jfreechart.
>> Is it ok to include this dependency with scope
On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
> jfreechart.
> Is it ok to include this dependency with scope test?
No problem IMO, as long as scope is test.
I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
jfreechart.
Is it ok to include this dependency with scope test?
btw. you can reference the test source in the user guide like this:
xref-test/org/apache/co
On 01/15/2013 02:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
>>> lots more and some whole sections that need to be
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
> > lots more and some whole sections that need to be rewritten.
> > Patches are most welcome.
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
> lots more and some whole sections that need to be rewritten.
> Patches are most welcome.
>
> One thing we might want to consider is creating separate test
> packages for th
I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
lots more and some whole sections that need to be rewritten.
Patches are most welcome.
One thing we might want to consider is creating separate test
packages for the User Guide examples. While this was not
consistently done, we
10 matches
Mail list logo