>
> The tricky bit here is a) how to encapsulate state in a generic way
> that has enough substance to it to be actually useful and b)
> similarly how to do the same for convergence. I am probably too
> influenced by the topological connotation of the latter term which
> makes it seem basically di
On 8/8/11 10:41 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Phil Steitz :
>> Sounds reasonable. Have a look at the StoppingCondition interface
>> and its implementations in the genetics package. Something like
>> that would probably work.
>>
>> Phil
>>
> I wasn't aware of o.a.c.m.genetics.StoppingCon
2011/8/8 Phil Steitz :
>
> Sounds reasonable. Have a look at the StoppingCondition interface
> and its implementations in the genetics package. Something like
> that would probably work.
>
> Phil
>
I wasn't aware of o.a.c.m.genetics.StoppingCondition. It's exactly
what I would need, only slightl
On 8/8/11 11:46 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> discussions regarding the development of iterative linear solvers
> (MATH-581) triggered the following issue. Usually, a default
> (efficiently implemented) convergence checker is provided for each
> standard linear iterative solver. However, it
Hi,
discussions regarding the development of iterative linear solvers
(MATH-581) triggered the following issue. Usually, a default
(efficiently implemented) convergence checker is provided for each
standard linear iterative solver. However, it would be very useful to
have the ability to use a custo
