Re: [math] Suggestion to refactor BinomialConfidenceInterval

2014-01-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/14/2014 09:16 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/13/14, 1:20 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/12/2014 06:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/14, 6:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Hi, we had some preliminary discussion about changing the BinominalConfidenceInterval class in M

Re: [math] Suggestion to refactor BinomialConfidenceInterval

2014-01-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/13/14, 1:20 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2014 06:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/14, 6:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> we had some preliminary discussion about changing the >>> BinominalConfidenceInterval class in MATH-1086. >>> >>> Right now the class provides some

Re: [math] Suggestion to refactor BinomialConfidenceInterval

2014-01-13 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/12/2014 06:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/14, 6:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we had some preliminary discussion about changing the >> BinominalConfidenceInterval class in MATH-1086. >> >> Right now the class provides some non-static methods to create various >> ConfidenceIn

Re: [math] Suggestion to refactor BinomialConfidenceInterval

2014-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/14, 6:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > we had some preliminary discussion about changing the > BinominalConfidenceInterval class in MATH-1086. > > Right now the class provides some non-static methods to create various > ConfidenceIntervals, and I was proposing to change them to be st

[math] Suggestion to refactor BinomialConfidenceInterval

2014-01-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, we had some preliminary discussion about changing the BinominalConfidenceInterval class in MATH-1086. Right now the class provides some non-static methods to create various ConfidenceIntervals, and I was proposing to change them to be static. Another option would be to allow sub-classing by