Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Ted Dunning"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
This sounds like the germ of a repair process.
Nuke all Serializable declarations without test cas
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Dunning"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
This sounds like the germ of a repair process.
Nuke all Serializable declarations without test cases. Then, add the
This sounds like the germ of a repair process.
Nuke all Serializable declarations without test cases. Then, add them back
where people care enough to guarantee correctness by demonstrating a correct
round trip.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
> But again, want to ask advice
- Original Message -
From: "Luc Maisonobe"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
Bill Barker a écrit :
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
linear.decomposition). So aski
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Dunning"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
Bill,
Did you commit those changes?
Yes, but just for o.a.c.m.linear.
I ask because I see similar issues with
l Barker"
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 12:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
>
>
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Luc Maisonobe"
>>
>> To: "Commons Developers List"
>> Se
Bill,
Did you commit those changes?
I ask because I see similar issues with abstract and static classes. Gamma
is an example of the static class issue. This class has only static
methods, but it is marked as serializable (why?). ContinuedFraction is a
good example of an abstract class that is
:13 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
- Original Message -
From: "Luc Maisonobe"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
[I changed the subject to help follow the thread]
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonob
- Original Message -
From: "Luc Maisonobe"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
[I changed the subject to help follow the thread]
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Ted Dunning a écrit
sebb a écrit :
> On 22/05/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> sebb a écrit :
>>
>>> On 22/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> >> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Ted Dunning a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> In favor or not, Serializable shouldn't in in widely used interfaces.
>>
>> As an e
sebb a écrit :
> On 22/05/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> sebb a écrit :
>>
>>> On 22/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> >> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Ted Dunning a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> In favor or not, Serializable shouldn't in in widely used interfaces.
>>
>> As an e
On 22/05/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
>
> > On 22/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ted Dunning a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> In favor or not, Serializable shouldn't in in widely used interfaces.
>
> As an example, a Lucene index is a
sebb a écrit :
> On 22/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Ted Dunning a écrit :
>>>
>>>
In favor or not, Serializable shouldn't in in widely used interfaces.
As an example, a Lucene index is a reasonable implementation of a sparse
matrix.
Would
[I changed the subject to help follow the thread]
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Ted Dunning a écrit :
>>
>>> In favor or not, Serializable shouldn't in in widely used interfaces.
>>>
>>> As an example, a Lucene index is a reasonable implementation of a sparse
>>> matrix.
>>>
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
