Re: [math] Review of a postponed issue.

2014-12-07 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:23:06 -0800, Ajo Fod wrote: Can you explain what specifically breaks binary compatibility that doesn't happen in other patches? ... and is there a test for this breakage? Well, I'm not sure; it's just a guess from the reason given for postponing to 4.0. If you want the f

Re: [math] Review of a postponed issue.

2014-12-07 Thread Ajo Fod
Can you explain what specifically breaks binary compatibility that doesn't happen in other patches? ... and is there a test for this breakage? -Ajo. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ajo Fod wrote: > Ah, thanks. > > -Ajo. > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Gilles > wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Dec 20

Re: [math] Review of a postponed issue.

2014-12-07 Thread Ajo Fod
Ah, thanks. -Ajo. On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:57:05 -0800, Ajo Fod wrote: > >> Guess we pushed this to 4.0 not 3.4 >> ... but just in case its time. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1016 >> >> -Ajo >> > > IIUC correctly, the change which

Re: [math] Review of a postponed issue.

2014-12-06 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:57:05 -0800, Ajo Fod wrote: Guess we pushed this to 4.0 not 3.4 ... but just in case its time. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1016 -Ajo IIUC correctly, the change which you proposed there cannot be considered for a minor release since it would break binary co

[math] Review of a postponed issue.

2014-12-05 Thread Ajo Fod
Guess we pushed this to 4.0 not 3.4 ... but just in case its time. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1016 -Ajo