Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-04-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 04/28/2014 09:34 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 4/28/14, 12:51 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 28/04/2014 09:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> Hi all, >> Hi Thomas, >> >>> whats the status for the 3.3 release? >> >From my side, everything is ready now. >> >>> I would volunteer as RM if there are no

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-04-28 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/28/14, 12:51 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 28/04/2014 09:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> Hi all, > Hi Thomas, > >> whats the status for the 3.3 release? > >From my side, everything is ready now. > >> I would volunteer as RM if there are no objections. > Great ! Thanks a lot for this. I have t

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-04-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 28/04/2014 09:41, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > Hi all, Hi Thomas, > > whats the status for the 3.3 release? >From my side, everything is ready now. > > I would volunteer as RM if there are no objections. Great ! Thanks a lot for this. I have to admit I was little daunted by the task ... b

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-04-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi all, whats the status for the 3.3 release? I would volunteer as RM if there are no objections. Thomas On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/08/2014 06:25 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. > > Looking through th

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-16 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/08/2014 06:25 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. > Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: > > TN (in progress): > > * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section in userguide > * [MATH-1061] Improve filter se

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:47:10 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 02/09/2014 11:39 PM, Gilles wrote: [...] Another thing to be concerned of: right now we have already *3* places in the library where e.g. the GaussNewtonOptimizer resides: * optimization.general * optim.nonlinear.vector.jacobian

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/09/2014 11:39 PM, Gilles wrote: >> [...] >> >> Another thing to be concerned of: right now we have already *3* places >> in the library where e.g. the GaussNewtonOptimizer resides: >> >> * optimization.general >> * optim.nonlinear.vector.jacobian >> * fitting.leastsquares >> >> two of them

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Gilles
[...] Another thing to be concerned of: right now we have already *3* places in the library where e.g. the GaussNewtonOptimizer resides: * optimization.general * optim.nonlinear.vector.jacobian * fitting.leastsquares two of them deprecated. This is kind of crazy ;-). The ML archive will

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/09/2014 12:46 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/08/2014 10:16 PM, Gilles wrote: >> Hi. >> >>> >>> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. >>> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> * [MATH-923] Kohonen's SOFM: can it be considered fin

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 09/02/2014 14:56, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Le 09/02/2014 13:26, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 02/09/2014 12:42 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 02/09/2014 12:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 09/02/2014 00:40, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 09/02/2014 13:26, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 02/09/2014 12:42 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 02/09/2014 12:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 09/02/2014 00:40, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/09/2014 12:42 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/09/2014 12:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 09/02/2014 00:40, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I think we are very close to releasing

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/09/2014 12:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 09/02/2014 00:40, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Hi, I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. Looking through the issues, the following sh

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 09/02/2014 00:40, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. >>> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: >>> >>> TN (in progress): >

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/08/2014 10:16 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > >> >> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. >> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: >> >> [...] >> >> * [MATH-923] Kohonen's SOFM: can it be considered finished? > > Done. > >> * [MATH-928] Alternative approac

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/08/2014 07:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. >> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: >> >> TN (in progress): >> >> * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section i

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Gilles
Hi. I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: [...] * [MATH-923] Kohonen's SOFM: can it be considered finished? Done. * [MATH-928] Alternative approach to matrix implementations: postpone to 4.0? Done. * [

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/08/2014 07:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. >> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: >> >> TN (in progress): >> >> * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section i

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. > Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: > > TN (in progress): > > * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section in userguide > * [MATH-1061] Improve filter section i

Re: [math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. > Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: > > TN (in progress): > > * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section in userguide > * [MATH-1061] Improve filter section i

[math] Release planning for 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, I think we are very close to releasing 3.3. Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved: TN (in progress): * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section in userguide * [MATH-1061] Improve filter section in userguide * [MATH-749] Convex Hull algorithm: almost fi