Not really "off-list". Sorry for the noise...
Gilles
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 01:41:25 +0100, Gilles wrote:
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Ole
Thanks, Ole.
Best wishes to you too,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Ole
Thanks, Ole.
Best wishes to you too,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On 12/31/2015 05:42 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:54:00 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:54:00 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual
On 12/31/2015 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual type is an "implementation detail".
Flexibility is
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:33:56 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what
type of RealMatrix instance to return.
Ideally, this is correct as the actual type is an "implementation
detail".
Flexibility is gained if it
just returns double[][]
On 12/31/2015 03:33 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 31/12/2015 04:33, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
[...]
Of course, using this feature is rather expert use. Typically, it is
done when some algorithm creates the data array by itself, and then
wants to return it as a matrix, but will not use the array by
Le 31/12/2015 04:33, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what type
> of RealMatrix instance to return. Flexibility is gained if it just
> returns double[][] letting the caller decide what type of RealMatrix
> instance to create. It's also b
Hi,
In RealMatrixFormat.parse() MatrixUtils makes the decision on what type of
RealMatrix instance to return. Flexibility is gained if it just returns
double[][] letting the caller decide what type of RealMatrix instance to
create. It's also better for modularity, as is reduces RealMatrixFor
