Bill Barker a écrit :
> Yes, happy to help. But would like comments on my latest copy/paste
> implementation. Reading over it again, there should be an
> AbstractIntHashMap class that does the duplicated code. But if you are
> planning to release soon, that could be pushed to v2.1. In any c
s Developers List"
>>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [math] Questions on Field
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> - "Bill Barker" a écrit :
>>&
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Questions on Field
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Steitz"
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [math] Questions on Field
>
>
> > luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Questions on Field
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
I've been looking over the Field
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
I've been looking over the Field implementations, and it looks like
it's
mostly done except for FieldPolynomial. I'm not really sure which
SparseFieldMatrix and SparseFieldVector are also missing for now.
package this
- "Bill Barker" a écrit :
> I've been looking over the Field implementations, and it looks like
> it's
> mostly done except for FieldPolynomial. I'm not really sure which
SparseFieldMatrix and SparseFieldVector are also missing for now.
>
> package this should go in, since o.a.c.m.analy
I've been looking over the Field implementations, and it looks like it's
mostly done except for FieldPolynomial. I'm not really sure which
package this should go in, since o.a.c.m.analysis.polynomial seems to be
about Real polynomials. Any hints would be appreciated.
I could provide implement
