Hi Bill,
>
> And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
> dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
> e.g.:
> RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
> RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
> a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
>
Hi Bill,
2012/6/19 Bill Barker :
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Luc Maisonobe
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
>
>
>> Hi Sébastien,
>>
>>
ne 17, 2012 11:11 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Dear all,
in this thread,
http://markmail.org/thread/hhvm6wv3d3uhkwqs
we had an interesting discussion on a bug which was revealed by
abstract unit tests on all implementations of RealV
-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Dear all,
in this thread,
http
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> in this thread,
> http://markmail.org/thread/hhvm6wv3d3uhkwqs
> we had an interesting discussion on a bug which was revealed by
> abstract unit tests on all implementations of RealVector. It turns out
> that the bug is
Dear all,
in this thread,
http://markmail.org/thread/hhvm6wv3d3uhkwqs
we had an interesting discussion on a bug which was revealed by
abstract unit tests on all implementations of RealVector. It turns out
that the bug is more far-reaching than we initially thought, and I
would like to make sure th
