Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/23/11 2:05 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 23/11/2011 09:16, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : >> I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking >> parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality). >> Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know,

Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking > > parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality). > > Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess > > the people who do know will reply on that :-). > > I would very much li

Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Sébastien Brisard
> I would very much like to have a simplified API. > > I also would vevery very much like to see 3.0 released, so if we are > gonna doing some API change here, we should really go forward and do it > fast. I'll start another thread about this. > > Luc > you're right, Luc, sorry for that. I'll answe

Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 23/11/2011 09:16, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : > I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking > parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality). > Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess > the people who do know will repl

Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality). Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess the people who do know will reply on that :-). Cheers, Mikkel. 2011/11/23 Ted Dunning : > I

Re: [math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-23 Thread Ted Dunning
I still think it is a good idea. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 22, 2011, at 23:27, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hello, > I would like to revive a discussion which took place a few months ago, > about the design of the matrix and vector classes. As far as I remember, > what came out was that these c

[math] Matrices and Vectors again

2011-11-22 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, I would like to revive a discussion which took place a few months ago, about the design of the matrix and vector classes. As far as I remember, what came out was that these classes would benefit from a more functional approach, à la Mahout. Additionally, I think Ted suggested that we introdu