Hi,
2012/7/9 Sébastien Brisard :
> HI,
>
> 2012/7/9 Sébastien Brisard :
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2012/7/9 Luc Maisonobe :
>>> On 09/07/2012 07:08, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> Hello,
>> most exis
HI,
2012/7/9 Sébastien Brisard :
> Hello,
>
> 2012/7/9 Luc Maisonobe :
>> On 09/07/2012 07:08, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> 2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski :
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hello,
> most existing methods in class RealVector allow method c
Hello,
2012/7/9 Luc Maisonobe :
> On 09/07/2012 07:08, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> 2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski :
>>> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hello,
most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
>>>
>>> Chaining does not always ma
On 09/07/2012 07:08, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> 2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski :
>> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
>>
>> Chaining does not always make for readable code.
>>
>>> However, som
2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> Hello,
>> most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
>
> Chaining does not always make for readable code.
>
>> However, some methods just return void instead of this
>> - addTo
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hello,
> most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
Chaining does not always make for readable code.
> However, some methods just return void instead of this
> - addToEntry
> - set
> - setEntry
> -
Hello,
most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
However, some methods just return void instead of this
- addToEntry
- set
- setEntry
- setSubVector
- unitize
Are you OK with having all or only some (which ones) methods return this?
Best regards,
Sébastien
-
