Re: [math] Feedback needed on MATH-735

2012-01-31 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Dear all, > > If there is no strong objection expressed against this solution in the > coming days, I will go for the first option (i.e. the pair > getResidual()/providesResidual()), as it avoids having to define > tagging interface which I don't think would be very useful. > I've now implemented

Re: [math] Feedback needed on MATH-735

2012-01-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi again, > > Dear all, > I know it's not the time to open new issues, but this one should be > quickly solved (I promise!), and I think it would really improve the > whole framework for iterative linear solvers. Anyway, please have a > look to what I've written. Also, I really need  some feedback

[math] Feedback needed on MATH-735

2012-01-28 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Dear all, I know it's not the time to open new issues, but this one should be quickly solved (I promise!), and I think it would really improve the whole framework for iterative linear solvers. Anyway, please have a look to what I've written. Also, I really need some feedback on point #4, which I r