On 10/21/13 9:19 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Investigation / tests / documentation much appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this!
> OK Phil I'll have another go. I would like to propose three patches
> (three JIRAs?)
>
> 1. The javadoc updat
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Investigation / tests / documentation much appreciated.
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
OK Phil I'll have another go. I would like to propose three patches
(three JIRAs?)
1. The javadoc updates discussed on this thread, which I really
would
On 10/19/13 5:14 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The decomposition solvers can "invert" non-square matrices. There
>> is no documentation describing what exactly is being returned in
>> these cases. It is not obvious to me exactly what conditions th
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The decomposition solvers can "invert" non-square matrices. There
> is no documentation describing what exactly is being returned in
> these cases. It is not obvious to me exactly what conditions the
> returned value satisfies in each case w
On 10/19/2013 01:21 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The decomposition solvers can "invert" non-square matrices. There
> is no documentation describing what exactly is being returned in
> these cases. It is not obvious to me exactly what conditions the
> returned value satisfies in each case when the act
The decomposition solvers can "invert" non-square matrices. There
is no documentation describing what exactly is being returned in
these cases. It is not obvious to me exactly what conditions the
returned value satisfies in each case when the actual parameter is
not square. Do all of them return
Hello,
I've been playing around with these three formats. Here are my thoughts
xdoc
+ already used by the existing doc,
+ possible to embed XHTML tags,
- like all xml based languages, it is difficult to read, especially
when it comes to tables.
apt
+ increased readability,
- not possibl
On 9/9/11 10:19 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Okay, I have begun nibbling on the doc. I will push a few changes I made in
> connection to doing no intercept regression in SimpleRegression.
Great! I usually now fail at this, but I used to try to bundle all
of the following in commits that change o
Okay, I have begun nibbling on the doc. I will push a few changes I made in
connection to doing no intercept regression in SimpleRegression.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/28/11 7:24 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > What tool is used to create the d
On 8/28/11 7:24 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> What tool is used to create the documentation (if one is used at all)?
> Specifically, I am looking in commons-math/src/site/xdoc/userguide
> If I wanted to add to the regression portion of stat.xml what is the best
> way to accomplish th
Hello All,
What tool is used to create the documentation (if one is used at all)?
Specifically, I am looking in commons-math/src/site/xdoc/userguide
If I wanted to add to the regression portion of stat.xml what is the best
way to accomplish this (use vi or some wysiwyg editor)?
Thank you,
-Greg
11 matches
Mail list logo
