d ContinuousDistribution, i.e. with successors of
> Distribution which neither implement DiscreteDistribution nor
> ContinuousDistribution.
Thinking about this some more, I agree.
Phil
> Best Regards,
> Christian
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apac
bsolutely continuous distribution. I'm fine with a "gap" between
DiscreteDistribution and ContinuousDistribution, i.e. with successors of
Distribution which neither implement DiscreteDistribution nor
ContinuousDistribution.
Best Regards,
Christian
--
View this message in context
On 10/28/11 9:31 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> The following question might sound stupid, but occured to me while
> thinking about MATH-692. So here goes. What was initially meant by
> "Continuous Distribution" (as in AbstractContinuousDistribution) ?
> My view on this is that the underlying
Hi,
The following question might sound stupid, but occured to me while
thinking about MATH-692. So here goes. What was initially meant by
"Continuous Distribution" (as in AbstractContinuousDistribution) ?
My view on this is that the underlying random variable is defined by a
*density*, which takes