On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:12:05 +0300, Alexander Nozik wrote:
On 19.02.2018 15:58, Gilles wrote:
Unless I'm totally off base, I guess a code written in Kotlin
needs specific support (e.g. a library dependency) to be run
on a JVM.
If you do not use standard library, then no, you do not need anythin
On 19.02.2018 15:58, Gilles wrote:
Unless I'm totally off base, I guess a code written in Kotlin
needs specific support (e.g. a library dependency) to be run
on a JVM.
If you do not use standard library, then no, you do not need anything
else. And I mean that code could be rewritten in java and
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:17:34 +0300, Alexander Nozik wrote:
You got me wrong again.
What did I get wrong?
Kotlin is fully compatible with java and
usually one converts Java code to Kotlin, which is done
automatically.
Unless I'm totally off base, I guess a code written in Kotlin
needs speci
You got me wrong again. Kotlin is fully compatible with java and usually
one converts Java code to Kotlin, which is done automatically. But I can
convert kotlin code back to Java. Commons math does not support newer
versions of JVM with functional features, so for now it easier to think
in kotl
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:41:35 -0600, Matt Sicker wrote:
We've even talked about adding Scala libraries in the past and there
was
support, so I'd imagine Kotlin is fine as well. It may be worth
including
as its own module mainly due to the Kotlin dependency, though the
domain
itself helps raise
We've even talked about adding Scala libraries in the past and there was
support, so I'd imagine Kotlin is fine as well. It may be worth including
as its own module mainly due to the Kotlin dependency, though the domain
itself helps raise it to that level as it is.
On 18 February 2018 at 18:02, Gi
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:30:38 +0300, Alexander Nozik wrote:
On 17.02.2018 21:16, Gilles wrote:
I have a problem with the CM "Field".
Did you have a look at my comments to issue MATH-1448 (and related
code)?
Unfortunately, I don't have the time right now to go further with
that work; but I'm more
On 17.02.2018 21:16, Gilles wrote:
I have a problem with the CM "Field".
Did you have a look at my comments to issue MATH-1448 (and related
code)?
Unfortunately, I don't have the time right now to go further with
that work; but I'm more and more convinced that something is wrong
with the current
Hi.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 19:25:30 +0300, Alexander Nozik wrote:
Hello all,
Gilles suggested that I should write some considerations about
improvement to common maths automatic differentiation here. I've
opened an Issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1452
(I really do not like m
Hello all,
Gilles suggested that I should write some considerations about
improvement to common maths automatic differentiation here. I've opened
an Issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1452 (I really
do not like mailing lists). But since I've done my own implementation on
t
10 matches
Mail list logo
