Re: [math] About MATH-718

2012-02-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Sorry, I miss-clicked... wanted to send that mail to your e-mail address directly since the mailing list rejects attachments... For what ever reason "answer to sender" has the same effect as "anwser to list" in Thunderbird. I'll send it again to your address :-) Regards, Benedikt Am 03.02.2012

Re: [math] About MATH-718

2012-02-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 03.02.2012 08:14, schrieb Sébastien Brisard: Hi, as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are large-ish. I think this is a very interesting

Re: [math] About MATH-718

2012-02-03 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Luc, > > Hi Sébastien, > >> as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is >> in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta >> function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are >> large-ish. I think this is a very interesting issue, but al

Re: [math] About MATH-718

2012-02-03 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 03/02/2012 08:14, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hi, Hi Sébastien, > as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is > in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta > function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are > large-ish. I think t

[math] About MATH-718

2012-02-02 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are large-ish. I think this is a very interesting issue, but also one which will not be solved in o