Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
+1 >From me as well. Den 18/05/2011 22.22 skrev "Phil Steitz" : > On 5/18/11 2:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : >>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Should I replac

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/18/11 2:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >>> On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? Of course this should rea

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/5/18 Stephen Colebourne : > On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? >> >> Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ... > > In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are scrunched > together, giving oned, twod, t

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ... Because it is easier to re

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? > > > > Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ... Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it weren

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Stephen Colebourne
On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? > > Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ... In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are scrunched together, giving oned, twod, threed. Stephen

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/05/2011 09:58, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Le 18/05/2011 01:19, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : [...] The current layout in [math] is one o.a.c.math.geometry package with 6 3D specif classes. The current layout in [bsp] is one o.a.c.bsp.partitioning package that is dimension-independent, one o.a.c.b

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/05/2011 01:19, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : [...] The current layout in [math] is one o.a.c.math.geometry package with 6 3D specif classes. The current layout in [bsp] is one o.a.c.bsp.partitioning package that is dimension-independent, one o.a.c.bsp.utility package, three dimension-specific e

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-17 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> [...] > The current layout in [math] is one o.a.c.math.geometry package with > 6 3D specif classes. The current layout in [bsp] is one > o.a.c.bsp.partitioning package that is dimension-independent, one > o.a.c.bsp.utility package, three dimension-specific euclidean > packages o.a.c.bsp.euclidean

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 16/05/2011 16:19, Matt Benson a écrit : On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 5/15/11 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : +1 From me, too. OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of geometry as suggested by

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-16 Thread Matt Benson
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 5/15/11 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : >>> +1 From me, too. >> >> OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of >> geometry as suggested by Phil, and I have taken care

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/15/11 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : >> +1 >>> From me, too. > > OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of > geometry as suggested by Phil, and I have taken care to use the > proper new exceptions as suggested by Gilles. >

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-15 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit : +1 From me, too. OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of geometry as suggested by Phil, and I have taken care to use the proper new exceptions as suggested by Gilles. I could simply remove the bsp directory from sandbo

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-15 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
+1 >From me, too. Den 14/05/2011 11.08 skrev "Luc Maisonobe" : > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache > Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread > about this creation here: ). > >

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:42:45PM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 14/05/2011 17:54, Phil Steitz a écrit : > >On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >>Phil, > >> > >>>Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF > >>>perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-r

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Luc, Dimitri, I don't think you are really speaking about exception repackaging, you pointed it out only has an example of endless discussions, among others. right, it was just an example. I change to +1 because I have not technical point against its inclusion. I nevertheless expect a better

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/05/2011 21:04, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 10:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioni

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/14/11 10:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, >>> Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see >>> the thread

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/05/2011 16:03, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread about this creation here:

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Ted Dunning
Dmitry, this might be helpful: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The goal with Apache voting is not usually a simple majority, but rather full consensus where abstentions are counted as acceptance. Your -1 vote derails the consensus, but appears to have been made for non-technical rea

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/05/2011 17:54, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Phil, Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your veto. Do y

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/14/11 8:31 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Phil, > >> Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF >> perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) >> change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your >> veto. Do you have technical problems with

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Phil, Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your veto. Do you have technical problems with the code being proposed for inclusion? In a strict demo

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/14/11 7:28 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Luc, > >> package. So the component could be promoted and it really makes >> sense >> to have it inside [math]. > > Over the past several months, I read endless discussions regarding > some > 'philosophical' questions (e.g. on exceptions) affecting > co

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Luc, package. So the component could be promoted and it really makes sense to have it inside [math]. Over the past several months, I read endless discussions regarding some 'philosophical' questions (e.g. on exceptions) affecting commons-math, all delaying the relaese of 2.2. Unless one first

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, > Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see > the thread about this creation here: > ). > > Thinking further ab

Re: [math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
I'm +1 on this, a major release with new features sounds very nice! Have a nice WE, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache >

[math] [sandbox] merging Apache Commons BSP into Apache Commons Math

2011-05-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello, Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread about this creation here: ). Thinking further about it, I would like to directly merge it into [ma