Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Done in r1173788. Sébastien 2011/9/21 Phil Steitz : > On 9/21/11 5:23 AM, sebb wrote: >> Why not just add some text to the tag to explain what has happened? >> >> Something like: >> >> @since 2.0 (changed to concrete class in 3.0) > > +1 > > Phil >> >> 2011/9/21 Sébastien Brisard : >>> Maybe that

Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/21/11 5:23 AM, sebb wrote: > Why not just add some text to the tag to explain what has happened? > > Something like: > > @since 2.0 (changed to concrete class in 3.0) +1 Phil > > 2011/9/21 Sébastien Brisard : >> Maybe that tag should be removed (drastic... but no possible confusion!). >> Séb

Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Yes, that would be clear enough. Sébastien 2011/9/21 sebb : > Why not just add some text to the tag to explain what has happened? > > Something like: > > @since 2.0 (changed to concrete class in 3.0) > > 2011/9/21 Sébastien Brisard : >> Maybe that tag should be removed (drastic... but no possible

Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread sebb
Why not just add some text to the tag to explain what has happened? Something like: @since 2.0 (changed to concrete class in 3.0) 2011/9/21 Sébastien Brisard : > Maybe that tag should be removed (drastic... but no possible confusion!). > Sébastien > > 2011/9/21 Gilles Sadowski : >> On Wed, Sep 2

Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Maybe that tag should be removed (drastic... but no possible confusion!). Sébastien 2011/9/21 Gilles Sadowski : > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:25:13AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm currently working on MATH-662. So far, I have merged >> CholeskyDecomposition and CholeskyDecomposition

Re: [math] @since tag

2011-09-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:25:13AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently working on MATH-662. So far, I have merged > CholeskyDecomposition and CholeskyDecompositionImpl. My question is > very simple: CholeskyDecomposition exists as an interface since > version 2.0 (as indicated in

[math] @since tag

2011-09-20 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, I'm currently working on MATH-662. So far, I have merged CholeskyDecomposition and CholeskyDecompositionImpl. My question is very simple: CholeskyDecomposition exists as an interface since version 2.0 (as indicated in the current Javadoc), but as a concrete class since version 3.0 only. Should