Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/16 2:10 PM, sebb wrote: > I realise that other solutions have been posted, but for completeness > it might be useful to note that ViewVC can still be used for the SVN > history if necessary: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/_moved_to_git/math/ Thanks, Sebb! Phil > > > On 11 Janu

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread sebb
I realise that other solutions have been posted, but for completeness it might be useful to note that ViewVC can still be used for the SVN history if necessary: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/_moved_to_git/math/ On 11 January 2016 at 22:11, Phil Steitz wrote: > Now and then I want to go

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:28 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > > Thanks, all. I was not correctly using the commands or the web > GUI. Everything works fine. Sorry for the noise. > > Since you have the entire repository downloaded, you don't need the web GUI. That's one of the wonderful things about gi

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/16 2:42 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 11/01/2016 23:11, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be >> the way it is. I used to be able to just jump into the old >> svn-viewc thingy. That is now blocked with a message that just says >> "math

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:04 AM Silviu Burcea wrote: > I have also used gitk > > I've not used that one. I'll give it a shot!

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Al Chou
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:42 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 11/01/2016 23:11, Phil Steitz a écrit :> Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be> the way it is.  I used to be able to just jump into the old> svn-viewc thingy.  That is now blocked with a message that j

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 11/01/2016 23:11, Phil Steitz a écrit : > Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be > the way it is. I used to be able to just jump into the old > svn-viewc thingy. That is now blocked with a message that just says > "math is in git now." That is great; but when I go

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Shuan Yang
Which command you use? I can see the svn change log by command 'git log' on my local computer. See attachment screenshot. [image: 内嵌图片 1] Yang 2016-01-12 17:04 GMT+08:00 Silviu Burcea : > I have also used gitk > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:24 AM, James Carman > > wrote: > > > SourceTree is al

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-12 Thread Silviu Burcea
I have also used gitk On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:24 AM, James Carman wrote: > SourceTree is also very nice > > https://www.sourcetreeapp.com > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:12 PM James Carman > wrote: > > > Have you tried using your IDE? > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:11 PM Phil Steitz > wrote: > >

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-11 Thread James Carman
SourceTree is also very nice https://www.sourcetreeapp.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:12 PM James Carman wrote: > Have you tried using your IDE? > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:11 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be >> the way it is. I used

Re: [math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-11 Thread James Carman
Have you tried using your IDE? On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:11 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be > the way it is. I used to be able to just jump into the old > svn-viewc thingy. That is now blocked with a message that just says > "math is in

[math][all] Archaeology pre-git

2016-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Now and then I want to go back and research how the code got to be the way it is. I used to be able to just jump into the old svn-viewc thingy. That is now blocked with a message that just says "math is in git now." That is great; but when I go back in the git log, it always ends when whatever b