On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> No objections from me. Please dive right in.
>
Done.
Gary
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
No objections from me. Please dive right in.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/
Thanks for the explanation Gary, very appreciated!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The immediate use I have is to be able to run the unit tests for a given
> component as part of the b
The immediate use I have is to be able to run the unit tests for a given
component as part of the build for my product. For commons-lang and most
commons projects, this is a low cost item time-wise.
I want to know that the commons-foo jar will run on our build
configurations, with our OSs, JVMs, l
I don't see any blocking issue.
Can I you explain me please how this artifact can be reused? It's just
a matter of filling a lack in my knowledge, many thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
Hi All:
Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
