On 14 October 2014 14:07, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 9 October 2014 19:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> I'm not fond that we need this method. However you're raising a good point.
>> BooleanUtils only "talks" english. It understands "yes" and "no" but not
>> "ja" and "nein" or "oui" and "non". It woul
On 9 October 2014 19:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> I'm not fond that we need this method. However you're raising a good point.
> BooleanUtils only "talks" english. It understands "yes" and "no" but not
> "ja" and "nein" or "oui" and "non". It would be nice to have a possibilty
> to make the toBoole
I'm not fond that we need this method. However you're raising a good point.
BooleanUtils only "talks" english. It understands "yes" and "no" but not
"ja" and "nein" or "oui" and "non". It would be nice to have a possibilty
to make the toBoolean(String) method work for other langues.
OTOH this can e
Hi James,
IMHO I can't see the real need for this improvement,
any way, I disagree with this case
BooleanUtils.toBoolean(null, null) = true
Regards
--Filippo
2014-10-09 9:49 GMT+02:00 James Sawle :
> I have created a patch for the above issue, which adds a new method signature
> to simplify th
I have created a patch for the above issue, which adds a new method signature
to simplify the conversion from Strings to Booleans based upon a single true
boolean String. This is therefore unlike the other methods, which either take
no parameters (use a prebuilt list of true and false values), o
