No worries Pascal, it was good experience to change core logic of
RandomStringUtils, also I'm free to pickup something else now ;-)
Regards,
Amey
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017, 3:49 PM Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Sorry about wasting your work porting RandomStringUtils to commons-text. :(
>
> Sorry,
> Pasc
Sorry about wasting your work porting RandomStringUtils to commons-text. :(
Sorry,
Pascal
Am 29.09.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Amey Jadiye:
Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to
release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils if
lang-3.7 is far.
Reg
Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to
release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils if
lang-3.7 is far.
Regards,
Amey
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomS
> Am 29.09.2017 um 10:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher :
>
> After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils
> fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
+1
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
> Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
>> Options:
>>
>> (a) leave RandomStringUti
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:11:07 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that
RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
Options:
(a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang
After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that
RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b).
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
Options:
(a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull
request moving it into [text].
(b)
Options:
(a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull
request moving it into [text].
(b) undeprecate it in [lang].
The question is where should it reside? Does it fit as a general java Lang
extension or is it more focused on text?
I’m in the middle here. Note also
Can someone summarize what our options are here please? I'd rather see it
fresh than chasing links in mailing list archives and try to un-nest all
the nesting... ;-)
Gary
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins
wrote:
> As I'm pulling this in this crosses my mind:
>
> Wait I'm curious h
