Hi,
Am 14.06.2017 um 09:57 schrieb Jörg Schaible:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> locally I reworked the build of Jelly core to follow the Maven standard
>> layout. This of course renders all other build files dysfunctional.
>>
>> Are there any objections to drop these files?
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> locally I reworked the build of Jelly core to follow the Maven standard
> layout. This of course renders all other build files dysfunctional.
>
> Are there any objections to drop these files? Maven 1 is probably no
> longer in use anywhere. Most other Co
+1
Regards,
Amey
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, 12:22 AM Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> locally I reworked the build of Jelly core to follow the Maven standard
> layout. This of course renders all other build files dysfunctional.
>
> Are there any objections to drop these files? Maven 1 is probably no
>
+1
From: Benedikt Ritter
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, 14 June 2017 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Support for multiple build tools
+1, drop that stuff!
Oliver Heger schrieb am Di. 13. Juni 2017 um
20:52:
> Hi,
>
> locally I rew
+1, drop that stuff!
Oliver Heger schrieb am Di. 13. Juni 2017 um
20:52:
> Hi,
>
> locally I reworked the build of Jelly core to follow the Maven standard
> layout. This of course renders all other build files dysfunctional.
>
> Are there any objections to drop these files? Maven 1 is probably n
Hi,
locally I reworked the build of Jelly core to follow the Maven standard
layout. This of course renders all other build files dysfunctional.
Are there any objections to drop these files? Maven 1 is probably no
longer in use anywhere. Most other Commons components have already
dropped their ant
