Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-11 Thread John Spackman
Hi Henri, Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to "put it in the window and see if we're invited to play" [...snip...] As below - analogy was about other Apache projects but probably applies here as you say.

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Repling inline to both Paul and John: On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit : >> Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the >> Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-09 Thread John Spackman
7;t been incorporated. One of the first tasks I'd undertake in rejuvenating Jelly would be to integrate patches and start updating JIRA. Regards John - Original Message - From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Sunday

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-09 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit : I agree that the website needs some changes although I had thought that this was largely for broken links and for a consistent left- hand side menu; updating the documentation for the taglibs is a pretty herculean task, not least because in orde

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-08 Thread Russel Winder
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 04:35 +, John Spackman wrote: [ . . . ] > I am prepared to upgrade Jelly to Maven2 (not that I know much about what > that involves, yet) and to improve the website but I have to be confident > that the changes will happen quickly and easily, and that the project will >

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-08 Thread John Spackman
Hi Paul, I agree that the website needs some changes although I had thought that this was largely for broken links and for a consistent left-hand side menu; updating the documentation for the taglibs is a pretty herculean task, not least because in order to document a taglib you have to fully