events" - NOTABUG
44 "[jelly] ClassLoader Problems with XMLParser and XMLParser reuse" -
POSTPONED
82 "Add UseVector tag" - POSTPONED (no response from submitter)
13 "Jelly should throw an exception if an unknown tag is used in a
TagLibrary" - FIXED
Regards,
John
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're converging John here,
>
> I'll try to keep up with patches and commits in order for you to become a
> committer.
> Henri, can you please agree that we "try to make jelly enter a maintained
> mode", within a month or
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Russel Winder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:27 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
>> threa
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:19 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs.
> Open/FederatedCommons
>
>
> We're converging John here,
>
> I'll try to keep up wi
Hi Henri,
Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to "put it in the
window
and see if we're invited to play" [...snip...]
As below - analogy was about other Apache projects but probably
applies here as you say.
ad?
John
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
We're converging John here,
I'll try to
quot;Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/
FederatedCommons
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept
of DVCS but it wa
John,
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 05:28 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I think you're talking about a different "problem" - Jelly is used for far
> more than Ant/Maven replacement (I don't usually use either) and maintaining
> it is not an altruistic choice for me, but a practical one because
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:27 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
> thread, marked [OT].
Possibly but I didn't think of it. On other lists that would ha
patch submission to JIRA yesterday (with a follow-up in
response to your comments today).
John
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: Re:
ractical one because I find it
so very useful.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Russel Winder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly
Repling inline to both Paul and John:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
>> Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
>> Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to
Hi all,
Just for the record, I have used Jelly in a commercial project as
well, in the installer of an application that supported multiple
databases (like Oracle and MySql) - we developed the database
installation/update script in Jelly.
So, regardless of the discussion of wheter Jelly is appropr
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
thread, marked [OT].
Some of these discussions have been happening at the ASF, on a more
appropriate list whose public archives are here:
http://mail-
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of
DVCS but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this.
But DVCS "only" does source code - setting up a seperate branch only
works if the community at large see the
John,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 06:11 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
> >Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
> >such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
>
> Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
> but it was
Hi Russel,
Forgive me for butting in on a conversation but . . .
Anytime :)
Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was m
7;t been incorporated.
One of the first tasks I'd undertake in rejuvenating Jelly would be to
integrate patches and start updating JIRA.
Regards
John
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Sunday
Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
I agree that the website needs some changes although I had thought
that this was largely for broken links and for a consistent left-
hand side menu; updating the documentation for the taglibs is a
pretty herculean task, not least because in orde
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 04:35 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I am prepared to upgrade Jelly to Maven2 (not that I know much about what
> that involves, yet) and to improve the website but I have to be confident
> that the changes will happen quickly and easily, and that the project will
>
unaffected, but new users and users wishing to update would be
referred to the new Federated Jelly website & repository.
Regards,
John
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, November
List" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wro
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm thinking we should:
>>
>> a) remove from trunks-proper
>> b) Update the homepage to say "Not Actively Maintained"
>> c) Upda
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm thinking we should:
>
> a) remove from trunks-proper
> b) Update the homepage to say "Not Actively Maintained"
> c) Update the Commons homepage to put this into a release subcategory
> of "Not Actively Maintained"
>
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
>>>
>>> I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
>>> is Jelly still i
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
>>
>> I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
>> is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
>
> Nick,
>
> Unfortunately
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:55 +0100, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Jelly is still unbeatable as a glue in xml processing.
I think that is a conjecture, a claim even, that needs justification and
support. Groovy, Python, Ruby people would argue (and I think quite
rightly) that XML is a data specification
Le 05-nov.-08 à 10:22, XuQing Tan a écrit :
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want
to know
is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
Nick,
Unfortunately no.
For a long time it was annoyed by the fact that building it required
huge resour
Hi, all
I'm recently investigating some excutable xml scripters. So I want to know
is Jelly still in development, since it's last release is in 2004?
--
Thanks & Best Regards!
Nick
30 matches
Mail list logo
