Hi all,
Note that replacing arrays with collections should not be done without
understanding the performance implications...
Gary
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:14, "Bruno P. Kinoshita"
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> Thanks, I'm trying to pull things straight to make it usable it current
>> environments. I us
Hi Thomas,
Thanks, I'm trying to pull things straight to make it usable it current
environments. I use the old version a lot. The code has more than 400
unit tests and a few disabled ones. Some tests tend to fail every now
and then (timing dependent). Those problems are hard to spot. I could
nee
On 01.06.12 06:31, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [jcs] seems very interesting :-) and maybe I could use it in some
> applications too (or at least knowing about it may help).
Thanks, I'm trying to pull things straight to make it usable it current
environments. I use the old version a lot
t
>Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 1:31 PM
>Subject: Re: [jcs] Request for review
>
>On 31.05.12 03:09, sebb wrote:
>> DoubleLinkedList looks incomplete.
>> It is parameterised by the node type (which must extend
>> DoubleLinkedListNode), but the node content type is not
On 31.05.12 03:09, sebb wrote:
> DoubleLinkedList looks incomplete.
> It is parameterised by the node type (which must extend
> DoubleLinkedListNode), but the node content type is not specified.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix this as I am no generics expert either.
Yeah, I failed on t
On 30 May 2012 19:32, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent quite some time to introduce generics in JCS. Now I finally
> managed to reintegrate the changes into trunk. I would kindly ask for
> reviewers. All improvements are welcome as I am no generics-expert.
DoubleLinkedList looks inco
Hi folks,
I spent quite some time to introduce generics in JCS. Now I finally
managed to reintegrate the changes into trunk. I would kindly ask for
reviewers. All improvements are welcome as I am no generics-expert.
Thanks in advance.
Bye, Thomas.
