Re: [io] Java 7

Am 16.12.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Gary Gregory: But maybe we should have a PathUtils instead? +1 for PathUtils - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.

Re: [io] Java 7

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I'd still like to make 2.5 a 1.6 release, it shouldnt be that far off. Can > you put it on a branch for now ? > 16. des. 2015 18.46 skrev "Gary Gregory" : > >> Hi All: >> >> I was about to add some APIs to FileUtils that work with Java 7

Re: [io] Java 7

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I'd still like to make 2.5 a 1.6 release, it shouldnt be that far off. Can > you put it on a branch for now ? > I'll just wait, unless 2.5 takes too long. No big rush though. Gary > 16. des. 2015 18.46 skrev "Gary Gregory" : > > > H

Re: [io] Java 7

I'd still like to make 2.5 a 1.6 release, it shouldnt be that far off. Can you put it on a branch for now ? 16. des. 2015 18.46 skrev "Gary Gregory" : > Hi All: > > I was about to add some APIs to FileUtils that work with Java 7 Paths but > [io] is still on Java 6. > > Are we OK to move to Java 7?

[io] Java 7

Hi All: I was about to add some APIs to FileUtils that work with Java 7 Paths but [io] is still on Java 6. Are we OK to move to Java 7? But maybe we should have a PathUtils instead? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition