The Apache Commons IO team is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Commons IO 2.20.0.
The Apache Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters,
file comparators, endian transformation classes, and much more.
Version 2.19.1: Java 8 or later is required
Yeah, I think Maven likes to fork things by default. I'm not sure if
there is a general way to say "fork nothing". It would seem painful
and clutter to configure each plugin to no-fork goals. Maybe that's a
feature request for Maven?
Gary
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 5:07 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> T
This release vote passes with the following votes:
- Tomas Lanik (non-binding)
- Gary Gregory (binding, gregory)
- Rob Tompkins (binding, chtompki)
- Piotr P. Karwasz (binding, plarwasz)
TY all,
Gary
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 4:35 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> W dniu 14.07.2025 o 23
Hi Gary,
W dniu 14.07.2025 o 23:36, Gary Gregory pisze:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
All looks good. +1. Many thanks Gary!
> On Jul 16, 2025, at 8:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> My +1
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 17:36 Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
>> IO 2.19.0 w
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 17:36 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.20.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.20.0 RC1 is available for review he
[+1] Go ahead with the release.
Tomas Lanik
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025, 23:37 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.20.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.20.0 RC1 i
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
IO 2.19.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
2.20.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.20.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.20.0-RC1 (svn
revision 78176)
The
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce Apache Commons IO 2.19.0.
The Apache Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters,
file comparators, endian transformation classes, and much more.
Version 2.19.0: Java 8 is required.
Historical list of changes
This vote passes with the following +1 binding votes:
- Rob Tompkins (chtompki)
- Gary Gregory (ggregory)
- Henri Biestro (henrib)
Thank you all,
Gary
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 12:13 PM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> [+1]
>
> Build & tests ok; site & javadoc looks good; changes & release history
> che
[+1]
Build & tests ok; site & javadoc looks good; changes & release history checked;
jira report (nit: a few issues remain no fix version);
Jacoco/Spotbugs/Checktyle, no issues.
Built using: mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988
My +1
Gary
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:14 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.18.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.19.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.19.0 RC1 is available for review
bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.18.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.19.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.19.0 RC1 is available for review here:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.19.0-RC1 (svn
> revision 76142)
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
IO 2.18.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
2.19.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.19.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.19.0-RC1 (svn
revision 76142)
The
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce Apache Commons IO 2.18.0.
The Apache Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters, file comparators, endian transformation
classes, and more. Java 8 is required.
Historical list of changes:
https
This vote passes with the following binding +1s from:
- Bruno Kinoshita (kinow)
- Gary Gregory (ggregory)
- Henri Biestro (henrib)
Thank you all,
Gary
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 5:21 AM Henri Biestro wrote:
> [ +1 ]
>
> Builds & tests, project reports look good, site ok, nice documentation
> ( +1
[ +1 ]
Builds & tests, project reports look good, site ok, nice documentation
( +1, no added dependency :-) ).
Built using:
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version: 1.8.0_432, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/zulu-8.jdk/Contents/Home
a-17-openjdk-amd64
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "6.8.0-48-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> "unix"
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 at 16:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > We have
on: "6.8.0-48-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
Thanks!
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 at 16:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons IO
> 2.17.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.18.0.
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons IO
2.17.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.18.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.18.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.18.0-RC1 (svn
revision 73112)
The
This vote passes with the following binding +1s:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory)
- Rob Tompkins (chtompki)
- Henri Biestro (henrib)
Gary
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 1:06 PM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
>
> [+1]
>
> Builds ok, site looks good, javadoc ok, reports ok.
>
> - Using:
> mvn clean install site -s "$H
[+1]
Builds ok, site looks good, javadoc ok, reports ok.
- Using:
mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
- On:
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version: 1.8.0_352, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc
+1, build, site, reports, signatures all good
Thanks Gary - keep up the good work
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Sep 15, 2024, at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.16.1 was released, so I would like to release Apach
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 1:57 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> IO 2.16.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
> 2.17.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.17.0 RC1 is available for review
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
IO 2.16.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO
2.17.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.17.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.17.0-RC1 (svn
revision 71599)
The
PING!
On 2024/04/29 12:27:10 Gary Gregory wrote:
> RE https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-855
>
> There are zero tests or usage in IO for PeekableInputStream.
>
> Could the original author add some?
>
> Why does PeekableInputStream extend CircularBufferInp
RE https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-855
There are zero tests or usage in IO for PeekableInputStream.
Could the original author add some?
Why does PeekableInputStream extend CircularBufferInputStream instead
of BufferedInputStream?
TY!
Gary
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, I found the following questions in
> https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609:
>
> > The behavior for a negative threshold should be the same as 0 IMO. WDYT?
> > What does it even mean that a threshold is negative?
> > Writing zero
Hi,
Today, I found the following questions in
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609:
> The behavior for a negative threshold should be the same as 0 IMO. WDYT?
> What does it even mean that a threshold is negative?
> Writing zero bytes writes nothing, so there is nothing to re
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce Apache Commons IO 2.16.1.
The Apache Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters,
file comparators, endian transformation classes, and much more.
Java 8 is required.
Fixed Bugs
--
o
gt; -Rob
> > >
> > > > On Apr 4, 2024, at 9:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [ The difference with RC1 is
> > > https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ]
> > > >
> > > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache
> >
> > > On Apr 4, 2024, at 9:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > [ The difference with RC1 is
> > https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ]
> > >
> > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
> > &
My +1
Gary
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 10:52 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1 build, signatures, site all checkout fine.
>
> -Rob
>
> > On Apr 4, 2024, at 9:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > [ The difference with RC1 is
> https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ]
+1 build, signatures, site all checkout fine.
-Rob
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 9:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [ The difference with RC1 is https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ]
>
> We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
> so I would like
[ The difference with RC1 is https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609 ]
We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.16.1.
Apache Commons IO 2.16.1 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos
I am canceling this vote to merge https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/609
RC2 is coming soon.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 4:54 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
> so I would like to release Apache Commons
-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
Thanks
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 22:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
> so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.16.1.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.16.1 RC1 is avai
We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 was released,
so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.16.1.
Apache Commons IO 2.16.1 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.16.1-RC1 (svn
revision 68319)
The Git tag commons-io
Gregory wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> > Commons IO 2.15.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> > Commons IO 2.16.0.
> >
> > Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> >https://
+1
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 9:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons IO 2.15.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons IO 2.16.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 RC1 is available for re
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 9:51 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons IO 2.15.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons IO 2.16.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 RC1 is available for review he
;, version: "5.15.0-101-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
Site reports look good, checked dist area files and found no issues.
Thanks!
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 14:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Comm
/zulu-8.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "14.4", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac"
hbiestro@D3CC9YTYXF-Henri-Biestro commons-io-2.16.0-RC1 %
Cheers
Henri
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons IO 2.15.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons IO 2.16.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.16.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.16.0-RC1 (svn
revision 68124
rable amount of time. Plus in Java
> 18 forward we simply don’t need it, as Gary said.
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
> > On Jan 24, 2024, at 1:45 PM, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-842 and
. Plus in Java 18
forward we simply don’t need it, as Gary said.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Jan 24, 2024, at 1:45 PM, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-842 and in light
> of UTF-8 being the default Charset for Java 18 and u
TY Sebb!
Gary
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:18 AM sebb wrote:
>
> Oops; fixed
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > It seems that [IO] tries and fails to deploy snapshots for PRs. That
> > should not happen, the deploying, that is.
>
Oops; fixed
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It seems that [IO] tries and fails to deploy snapshots for PRs. That
> should not happen, the deploying, that is.
>
> PR log:
> ...
> [INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:3.1.1:deploy (default-deploy) @ comm
It seems that [IO] tries and fails to deploy snapshots for PRs. That
should not happen, the deploying, that is.
PR log:
...
[INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:3.1.1:deploy (default-deploy) @ commons-io ---
189[INFO]
190[INFO
bitions are for components like
> Commons Imaging, Compress, Codec and IO:
>
> Generally for Commons, we say that unless otherwise specified it is up to
> the user of the library to make sure any input is either trusted or
> correctly validated/sanitized (https://commons.apache.org/secu
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 9:31 AM Arnout Engelen wrote:
>
> Examples of what I referred to as arbitrary code execution would be
> unbounded deserialization of untrusted data (via techniques like those
> described in the motivation for
> https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/core/serialization-f
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 8:31 AM Arnout Engelen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 2:00 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 6:09 AM Arnout Engelen
> wrote:
> > > * I'd say parsing/decompression/decoding should never allow malicious
> > input
> > > to trigger arbitrary c
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 2:00 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 6:09 AM Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > * I'd say parsing/decompression/decoding should never allow malicious
> input
> > to trigger arbitrary code execution(?)
>
> Do any of these products include native libraries/
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 6:09 AM Arnout Engelen wrote:
>
> Hello Commons developers,
>
> I'd like to discuss what our security ambitions are for components like
> Commons Imaging, Compress, Codec and IO:
>
> Generally for Commons, we say that unless otherwise specified
Hello.
Le jeu. 14 déc. 2023 à 12:10, Arnout Engelen a écrit :
>
> Hello Commons developers,
>
> I'd like to discuss what our security ambitions are for components like
> Commons Imaging, Compress, Codec and IO:
>
> Generally for Commons, we say that unless otherwise s
Hello Commons developers,
I'd like to discuss what our security ambitions are for components like
Commons Imaging, Compress, Codec and IO:
Generally for Commons, we say that unless otherwise specified it is up to
the user of the library to make sure any input is either trusted or
corr
e
'inaccessibleFiles' - because, appart from not being there, various
other reasons could lead to an exception - missing permissions, or
IO-errors to name two.
Catching this, you now have the problem, that you are depriving the user
of choice, because he actually might _want_ the Compara
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 12:01 AM Miguel Muñoz wrote:
>
> @Elliotte Rusty Harold,
> I'd like to make two unrelated points.
> 1. I wasn't suggesting the missingFilesFirst() or missingFilesLast() methods
> as a solution to the issues raised in IO-813 LastModifiedFileCompa
@Elliotte Rusty Harold,
I'd like to make two unrelated points.
1. I wasn't suggesting the missingFilesFirst() or missingFilesLast() methods
as a solution to the issues raised in IO-813 LastModifiedFileComparator
should not throw exceptions, period. I just tho
23 at 4:50 AM Miguel Muñoz wrote:
>
>
>
> In my comments about issue IO-813 LastModifiedFileComparator should not
> throw exceptions, period, I made a suggestion that I thought I'd repeat here.
> I was thinking of adding these two methods to AbstractFileComparato
to blow up and give me an
> error, or to silently succeed and tell me (or not tell me) somehow?
>
> I'd like to hear how these methods play into that (or not) and how (or
> not).
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 4:50 AM Miguel Muñozwrote:
>
ary
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 4:50 AM Miguel Muñoz wrote:
>
>
> In my comments about issue IO-813 LastModifiedFileComparator should not
> throw exceptions, period, I made a suggestion that I thought I'd repeat
> here. I was thinking of adding these two methods to AbstractFil
In my comments about issue IO-813 LastModifiedFileComparator should not throw
exceptions, period, I made a suggestion that I thought I'd repeat here. I was
thinking of adding these two methods to AbstractFileComparator.
public static Comparator missingFiles
US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > OS name: "linux", version: "5.15.0-89-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> > "unix"
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On 2023/11/24 16:38:29 Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > We have fixed quite one importa
b/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "5.15.0-89-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 2023/11/24 16:38:29 Gary Gregory wrote:
> > We have fixed quite on
15.0-89-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
Thanks!
On 2023/11/24 16:38:29 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed quite one important bug and added some enhancements
> since Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 was released, so I would like to
> release Apache Common
quite one important bug and added some enhancements
> since Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 was released, so I would like to
> release Apache Commons IO 2.15.1.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.15.1 RC1 is available for review here:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.15.1-R
I downgraded and commented in the Jira issue.
Gary
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023, 7:57 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IO/issues/IO-783?filter=allopenissues
> is listed as a Blocker and still open. IMHO it's a valid bug, but
> isn
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IO/issues/IO-783?filter=allopenissues
is listed as a Blocker and still open. IMHO it's a valid bug, but
isn't a total blocker. I suggest downgrading it to critical and
proceeding with the release.
That said, this is a pretty bad bug that could re
We have fixed quite one important bug and added some enhancements
since Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 was released, so I would like to
release Apache Commons IO 2.15.1.
Apache Commons IO 2.15.1 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.15.1-RC1 (svn
A PR with a test for FileChannels.contentEquals is available here:
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/509
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:37 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Can you turn this into a PR against HEAD that adds a unit test that
> fails? That would be fairly conclusive proof
t;
> I think I have found a bug in the new FileChannels.contentEquals(...) in
> Commons IO 2.15.0 which then affects RandomAccessFiles.contentEquals(...),
> PathUtils.fileContentEquals(...), FileUtils.contentEquals(...), and maybe
> more methods. But before opening an issue in ASF JIR
Hi,
I think I have found a bug in the new FileChannels.contentEquals(...) in
Commons IO 2.15.0 which then affects RandomAccessFiles.contentEquals(...),
PathUtils.fileContentEquals(...), FileUtils.contentEquals(...), and maybe
more methods. But before opening an issue in ASF JIRA, I would like to
On 26/10/2023 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
Java 8 is required.
This phrasing is somewhat confusing. "Java 8 or newer is required" would
help clarify things.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For add
The Apache Commons team announces Apache Commons IO Version 2.15.0
Commons IO is a package of Java utility classes like java.io. Classes
in this package are considered so standard and of such high reuse as
to justify their existence in java.io.
The Apache Commons IO library contains utility
gt; > >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 00:17, Gary Gregory
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yeah, I saw that on the site and simplified it, but I missed the release
> > >>> notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker
> > >
> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 00:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah, I saw that on the site and simplified it, but I missed the release
> >>> notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker
> >> IMO.
> >>>
>
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 00:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I saw that on the site and simplified it, but I missed the release
>>> notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker
>> IMO.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:43 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > wrote:
> >
> > > One nit. In the release notes I see this:
> > >
> > > Commons IO 2.9.0 requires Java 8.
> > > Commons IO 2.8.0 requires Java 8.
> > > Commons IO 2.7 requires
ase
> notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker IMO.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:43 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> wrote:
>
> > One nit. In the release notes I see this:
> >
> > Commons IO 2.9.0 requires Java 8.
> >
Yeah, I saw that on the site and simplified it, but I missed the release
notes, we can pretty up the text post release. Certainly not a blocker IMO.
Gary
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:43 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> One nit. In the release notes I see this:
>
> Commons IO 2.9.0 requir
One nit. In the release notes I see this:
Commons IO 2.9.0 requires Java 8.
Commons IO 2.8.0 requires Java 8.
Commons IO 2.7 requires Java 8.
Commons IO 2.6 requires Java 7.
Commons IO 2.5 requires Java 6.
Commons IO 2.4 requires Java 6.
Commons IO 2.3 requires Java 6.
Commons IO 2.2 requires
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons IO 2.14.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons IO 2.15.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.15.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.15.0-RC1 (svn
revision 64652
The build is broken (see GitHub emails), please fix or revert the
problematic commit.
Gary
Patience! ;-)
Gary
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 12:46 PM David wrote:
> hihi friends - my team encountered an issue with how java reports the
> system temp directory that nerfed up the ability of our app to run properly
> on some OS hosts. We fixed the problem on our end and backported the change
> t
hihi friends - my team encountered an issue with how java reports the
system temp directory that nerfed up the ability of our app to run properly
on some OS hosts. We fixed the problem on our end and backported the change
to y'all by way of the aforementioned PR. I haven't seen any comments or
mov
YW! 😁
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 10:34 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Thank you for your work!
>
> -Rob
>
> > On Sep 30, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> > Commons IO 2.14.0.
>
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons IO 2.14.0.
Commons IO is a package of Java utility classes like java.io. Classes
in this package are considered to be so standard and of such high
reuse as to justify existence in java.io.
The Apache Commons IO library
Thank you for your work!
-Rob
> On Sep 30, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Commons IO 2.14.0.
>
> Commons IO is a package of Java utility classes like java.io. Classes
> in this package ar
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons IO 2.13.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons IO 2.14.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.14.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.14.0-RC
te:
> >
> >[x] +1 Release these artifacts
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 18:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> > > Commons IO 2.13.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
My +1
Gary
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:38 AM Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
>
>[x] +1 Release these artifacts
>
> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 18:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> > Commons IO 2.13.0 was released,
[x] +1 Release these artifacts
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 18:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons IO 2.13.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons IO 2.14.0.
>
> Apache Commons IO 2.14.0 RC1 i
uilds successfully on all LTE java versions
> Reports look good,
> Rat Looks good,
> Signatures all check out.
>
> Cheers,
> -ROb :-p
>
> > On Sep 26, 2023, at 12:37 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements sinc
+1
Builds successfully on all LTE java versions
Reports look good,
Rat Looks good,
Signatures all check out.
Cheers,
-ROb :-p
> On Sep 26, 2023, at 12:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons IO 2.13.0 was released
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons IO 2.13.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons IO 2.14.0.
Apache Commons IO 2.14.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/2.14.0-RC1 (svn
revision 64208
Better documentation is quite reasonable :-) feel free to submit a PR
Thank you!
Gary
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, 10:13 AM James Reeves wrote:
> I was looking into a bug in FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 and tracked it down to a
> misuse of BoundedInputStream.onMaxLength. The reason I'm sending this email
> bef
I was looking into a bug in FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 and tracked it down to a misuse
of BoundedInputStream.onMaxLength. The reason I'm sending this email before
submitting a patch to FileUpload is that I believe this behavior is unexpected
enough to warrant a little extra in the onMaxLength docstring
> I already commented elsewhere on why this is not a good fit for IO
My bad, I did not realise that discussion is closed with final resolution.
I read "what do others think?" and thought that it is about continuing
discussion.
> Instead of keeping on arguing to shove your
Le jeu. 20 juil. 2023 à 15:18, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> [...] Instead of keeping on arguing to shove your library in [...]
If we could stop the brutal language... (?)
The OP asked politely, and was ready to wait indefinitely
(unsubscribing from this ML) for an answer; I just wanted
to make su
1 - 100 of 1024 matches
Mail list logo
