I took a quick look at id. I'm not a fan. First, despite the javadoc for
VersionOneGenerator saying that a config file is not necessary my test
failed without one. Other issues include:
1. It should use java.util.UUID and not invent its own UUID class.
2. It seems extremely overly complicated. T
On 11/22/11 1:21 PM, Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> I have a professional interest to get out a release of UUID as my current
> project would like to adopt it. I'd be more than happy to volunteer to
> help out/finish off the project so we can get it released.
Great! I will kick off a promotion vote.
I have a professional interest to get out a release of UUID as my current
project would like to adopt it. I'd be more than happy to volunteer to
help out/finish off the project so we can get it released.
Cheers, Adrian.
On 22 November 2011 13:55, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/22/11 8:38 AM, Jörg
On 11/22/11 8:38 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> Actually, UUID implementations aren't really obsolete. The Random UUID
>> generated by Java can't be guaranteed to be unique, just that the
>> probability that it is is very high. In many circumstances it is
>> desir
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
> Actually, UUID implementations aren't really obsolete. The Random UUID
> generated by Java can't be guaranteed to be unique, just that the
> probability that it is is very high. In many circumstances it is
> desirable to have a UUID where the uniqueness properties
